lundi 30 avril 2018

Trilateral: The Secret Circle That Controls Governments (30.04.2018)


The original stated goal of the Trilateral Commission was to create ‘a new international economic order’
Jon Rappoport | Infowars.com - APRIL 30, 2018 32 Comments 

Note: I have many new readers, and they have not read this article of mine, which I first posted several years ago. Here it is—

Who is in charge of destroying economies?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.
It’s called the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.”

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.



In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example:
* Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;

* James Jones, National Security Advisor;

* Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;

* Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).
The conversation was public knowledge at the time.

Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy (which includes trade treaties) were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.

The following 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.
COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.
US (and other nations’) economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission created in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

When Carter won the presidential election (1976), his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.

How does a shadowy group like the TC accomplish its goal? One basic strategy is: destabilize nations; ruin their economies; send millions and millions of manufacturing jobs off to places where virtual slave labor does the work; adding insult to injury, export the cheap products of those slave-factories back to the nations who lost the jobs and further undercut domestic manufacturers, forcing them to close their doors and fire still more employees.

And then solve that economic chaos by bringing order.

What kind of order?

Eventually, one planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, “to restore stability,” “for the good of all, for lasting harmony.”

The top Trilateral players, in 2008, had their man in the White House, another formerly obscure individual like Jimmy Carter: Barack Obama. They had new trade treaties on the planning table.

After Obama was inaugurated for his first term, he shocked and astonished his own advisors, who expected him, as the first order of business, to address the unemployment issue in America. He shocked them by ignoring the number-one concern of Americans, and instead decided to opt for his disastrous national health insurance policy—Obamacare.

Obama never had any intention of trying to dig America out of the crash of 2008. That wasn’t why he was put in the Oval Office. He could, and would, pretend to bring back the economy, with fudged numbers and distorted standards. But really and truly, create good-paying jobs for many, many Americans? Not on the TC agenda. Not in the cards.

It was counter-productive to the TC plan: further undermine the economy…

So that, one day, a student would ask his teacher, “What happened to the United States?” And the teacher would say, “It was a criminal enterprise based on individual freedom. Fortunately, our leaders rescued the people and taught them the superior nature of HARMONY AND COOPERATION.”

—The rough, uneven, and challenged nationalism surfacing in a number of countries is evidence that many people are waking up from the Trilateral-induced trance…
This article first appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com.





Thread by @redpillthread: "1. If you feel some things are not OK in Western countries read this and you will understand what is happening2. Have you noticed that nearl […]"

22 tweets4 days ago
 
 

1. If you feel some things are not OK in Western countries read this and you will understand what is happening
2. Have you noticed that nearly all Western countries are becoming "multicultural"?

And have you noticed that this is NOT happening to non-Western countries?
3. How come most countries that were white only 50 years ago are now diverse?

If this is something that happens naturally, how come Japan or China or so many other non-Western countries are not becoming multicultural at all?
4. If this is NOT happening naturally, then how come you have never heard about it?

You would think something as important as entire countries having demographic transformation imposed on them is worthy of at least a documentary or news article?
5. The answer to this is that the people who are behind the multicultural transformation of Western countries are the same people who own or control the mass media in those countries

Who are they? The answer is simple but politically incorrect to talk about
6. The main thing in common between the people who control Western media and the people responsible for the multiculturalization of Western countries is that they are Jews

Never heard about this in the media before? You never will. Let's look at an example
7. In the case of America, the multicultural demographic change started in 1965 with the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, proposed by the Jewish politician Emanuel Celler

In Western countries you will always find Jewish organizations promoting immigration

Why is this?
8. Jews have a long history of conflict with the European Christian populations of the countries in which they have lived

Given their history, they believe a fully white Christian country is not an ideal place to live in

They believe multicultural countries are better for them
9. What they are doing is multiculturalizing Western countries by flooding them with non-whites

As part of that agenda, they are redefining Western identities using their media

"Africans can be Germans too! Europeans are not necessarily white!"
10. In their effort to make white countries non-white, it is important to make the original white populations mix with the imported non-white populations

Therefore something they are also doing is promoting interracial couples

Google "pregnant white women" and notice a pattern
11. Or try googling "European people history"

They are working hard to sell the idea that the West is and must be multicultural (non-white)
12. If this were being done to any other countries it would be denounced as genocide

Imagine going to Japan and telling them Japan will no longer be racially Japanese and replacing them demographically without asking them

You are witnessing ethnic cleansing
13. Logically, they do not call it "ethnic cleansing" or "genocide"

They refer to it using pretty and happy words like:

-"Diversity"
-"Multiculturalism"
-"Inclusion"
-"Tolerance"

"Diversity is our strength!" might sound familiar
14. In several European countries like Germany and Britain they have made it illegal for people to talk about what is happening by promoting laws to ban "hate speech"

And "hate speech" happens to include criticism of Jews or non-white immigration
15. You will not hear about this explanation in your TV or newspaper

Meanwhile, countries that were historically white will keep becoming more and more "diverse" and "multicultural" until white people are minorities in their own homelands
16. If you did not understand why different Western countries are importing large populations of people culturally incompatible with Western society, now you know

The multiculturalization of white countries is not being done for the benefit of white people
17. "Why would many Jews want to import immigrants that can be dangerous to them?"

As previously mentioned, the biggest threat to them is nationalist hostility

Watch an important Rabbi (Pinchas Goldschmidt) saying Jews are fighting alongside Muslims against Old Europe
18. Obviously, not all Jews promote immigration. That would be an oversimplification

Nevertheless, Jewish organizations (including media) are the main common element promoting non-white immigration in white countries
19. In order to understand why Jews would have an anti-white behavior in white countries, it is useful to understand that many do not consider themselves technically "white" (they are Semites, hence the term "anti-Semitism")

They do not identify as a part of the white majority
20. As seen in the previous video, they do however many times use the fact that they look similar to whites to undermine white racial interests which they see as a threat

"Fellow white people let's not be racist! We must share our country!"
21. Again, you will never see anyone talking about this on TV or any relevant newspaper

Meanwhile, countries that had white populations for hundreds or thousands of years until recently are becoming majority non-white

Europeans were never asked if they wanted this
22. This thread is an attempt to raise awareness of what is happening because people deserve to know. Please share it if you think it makes sense

Recommended book with detailed explanation: The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald



    1. Fin de la conversation
    1. Nouvelle conversation
    2. Fin de la conversation

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

Articles riposte laïque à faire

- reprendre une à une les règles de soumission de l'islam (faire un chapitre pour chacune) - invasion islamique de l'inde à reman...